Table Places and Honor
Sermon
preached by the Rev. Lowell E. Grisham, Rector
St.
Paul's Episcopal Church, Fayetteville, Arkansas
September
1, 2013; 15 Pentecost, Proper 17, Year C
Episcopal
Revised Common Lectionary
(Luke 14:1, 7-14) On one occasion when Jesus was going to the
house of a leader of the Pharisees to eat a meal on the sabbath, they were
watching him closely.
When he noticed how the guests chose the places of honor, he told them
a parable.
"When you are invited by someone to a wedding banquet, do not sit
down at the place of honor, in case someone more distinguished than you has
been invited by your host; and the host who invited both of you may come and
say to you, `Give this person your place,' and then in disgrace you would start
to take the lowest place. But when you are invited, go and sit down at the
lowest place, so that when your host comes, he may say to you, `Friend, move up
higher'; then you will be honored in the presence of all who sit at the table
with you. For all who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble
themselves will be exalted."
He said also to the one who had invited him, "When you give a
luncheon or a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your
relatives or rich neighbors, in case they may invite you in return, and you
would be repaid. But when you give a banquet, invite the poor, the crippled,
the lame, and the blind. And you will be blessed, because they cannot repay
you, for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous."
__________
One of the reasons it can be hard for us to interpret the New Testament is that our culture is fundamentally different from the first century Mediterranean world. Understanding something about their presuppositions adds particular interest to today’s gospel.
Jesus lived in an honor culture. For people in his world, honor was what money
is to us today. In Jesus’ world, one’s
worth was measured corporately, by the amount of honor you carry.
In our culture we have credit ratings. You can’t get a loan to buy a house without
good credit. Right?
In an honor culture, your good name and your reputation of
ultimate value. No one will freely
associate with you in a covenant relationship unless your honor is good –
unless you have a good name and a good family reputation. In an honor culture, your honor would be
measured almost as accurately we measure credit scores today.
Your honor rating is the alignment of two things: what you think you are worth and what society
acknowledges you are worth. And it’s not
about money. It’s about honor.
An honorable person is one who is sensitive to one’s own
reputation – who accurately understands the opinions of others and lives
consistently within the status and honor that the community grants. A shameless person doesn’t understand the
rules of what is honorable and what is not.
A very shameful person is one who aspires to a certain status and finds
that status is denied them by public opinion.
Everyone at the Pharisee’s dinner party understood Jesus’
illustration about the person who misjudged his status and sat in a seat of
honor that was above his status. That is
a conventional story about honor and shame with a conventional lesson that
would have been comfortable to anyone present.
The Book of Proverbs is full of similar advice.
S
|
o let’s dig a little deeper.
Let me tell you about a typical seating chart at a first century
banquet. Imagine a U-shaped table, low
to the floor so that everyone could recline, typically toward one’s left, in
order to use the right hand to reach for the food and drink. Imagine looking toward the table with the
open end of the “U” facing you. To your
left, the first table position was filled by the person responsible for going
back and forth to the kitchen to resupply the tables. Next to him, at position number two, was the
host. To the host’s immediate left
reclined the guest of honor. And the
other guests sat around the table in declining order of prestige. Someone in the middle of the “U” at position
seven would be a person of more honor than someone at the opposite end of the
table, say at position eleven.
A wise person could look around a room and find his
appropriate place, correctly evaluating his rank. A fool, a shameless person, might place
himself at position four, and when the real occupant of that place comes in,
the fool would find the other places filled, and would have been bumped to the
end of the table, suddenly earning his shameful standing by aspiring to
something he didn’t deserve.
Now a brief aside for another story. When next we read John’s account of the Last
Supper, have this order of seating in your imagination. I think you’ll see that the guest of honor
that evening, seated to the left of the host Jesus, was Judas Iscariot. After all he was the treasurer of the
apostles and maybe the chair of preparations.
Judas may have been Jesus’ closest and most trusted, honored companion
among the twelve. Come back for more
during Holy Week.
But back to today.
Jesus’ advice about being slow to grab a seat of honor was conventional
advice. His words would have been
received positively at this meal at the Pharisee’s home. But what Jesus said next would have sounded
scandalous.
Everybody knew that throwing a banquet was an affair of
honor. A host must be careful to invite
people of comparable rank, people whom he might owe an invitation to, or those
who might invite him back to a table of comparable honor.
Everybody knew the order of seating could become a field of
challenge: Who is more honorable than
whom? How will the host and the guests
acknowledge each person’s reputation and social worth? Furthermore:
Will the table enhance the worth and honor of those present, or will
they be demeaned by sitting with inferiors?
To place honorable persons with dishonorable persons would bring shame
to the host? He would have miscalculated
and insulted his most honored guests. He
would have lost face, and honor. It’s a
tough game.
J
|
esus’ words to the host were like a wet backhand across the
face. "When you give a luncheon or
a dinner, do not invite your friends or your brothers or your relatives or rich
neighbors, in case they may invite you in return, and you would be repaid.” [Despite that being the whole conventional
system.] “But when you give a banquet,
invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind. And you will be blessed, because they cannot
repay you, for you will be repaid at the resurrection of the righteous."
Jesus’ words are an indictment and a challenge to the whole
social order.
You see, “the poor, the crippled, the lame and the blind”
are those that the Pharisees taught were not to be included in the congregation
of the faithful. The Pharisees believed
that all Israel was a holy people, a nation of priests. And therefore all people were bound by the
613 individual laws of the Torah of Moses.
And in the Torah, in Leviticus 21, the scripture says that no one “who
has a blemish shall draw near, [or] one who is blind or lame, or one who has a
mutilated face or a limb too long, or one who has a broken foot or a broken
hand, or a hunchback, or a dwarf, or a man with a blemish in his eyes or an
itching disease or scabs or crushed testicles” – these are excluded from the
holy people, the nation of priests.[i] And the poor?
They are like these others – unfortunate, but also dishonorable.
The conventional belief presumed that these afflicted ones
deserved their fate. Maybe you remember
the question from John 9, when people asked Jesus his opinion, “Rabbi, who
sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” Jesus did not accept the question. He changed the rules. Jesus refused to victimize the victims.
J
|
esus scandalized his society by his open table fellowship,
by his welcome and his free touching and healing of those believed to be
cursed. He completely sabotaged the
honor system, welcoming sinners and outcasts, declaring blessing upon those
thought to be judged and punished by God.
He announced “blessed are the poor, the meek, the hungry, those who weep
and mourn, the hated and ostracized.”
And then he flipped the tables and said, “Woe to you who are rich and
well fed and laughing now.” (Matthew 5 & Luke 6)
At Jesus’ table, the wealthy, like Joseph of Arimathea and
Nicodemus, are expected to sit down as equals with fishermen and tax collectors
and Mary Magdalene at a table where he calls them all “friends.” He told his disciples, You know how those honor tables are; it shall not be so among you. No, the greatest among you must become like
the least, and the leader, like a servant.
(Lk. 22:24f)
Can anyone doubt what Jesus would say to us today about our
social system and its hierarchies of money and power? We may not be an honor culture, but in our
way of acknowledging worth, we aren’t so different from the first century. We just use money instead of honor.
And if we are not to earn Jesus’ condemnation as hypocrites,
we are going to have to create social structures and individual behaviors that
favor “the poor, the crippled, the lame, and the blind” and all of those who
fall between the cracks in our systems of power and prestige.
T
|
[i]
thanks again to Paul McCracken for his Lectionary Notes, this from August 27,
2013, and to my friend Charles Page
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home